As a Twitter user, this burningpants correspondent has been confounded by the flurry of tweets by senior economic analysts clamoring for more regulation and government intervention into the markets. Marx has come back into vogue for many… again.

The media is having a field day with the theatre of doom and gloom. The doom theatre has its own bad guys such the speculators, the hedge funds, the short sellers, the greedy bankers. According to Matt Damon narration in the flick Inside Job, these individuals are often fuelled by cocaine snorting prostitute junkies too!

The baddies even have their own ideology: the efficient market hypothesis where the assumption of rationality holds sway. However, according to politicians and numerous academics, rationality does not rule in financial markets. Rather the animal spirits, as Keynes would label, rule and control asset prices in markets.

The concept is seductive especially in the context of the past month. Understandably, most people are questioning the utility of free markets, especially if they see their wealth being diminished.

When confronted by these seemingly excessively volatile markets, more regulation seems to be the first port of call rather than tackling the rot that causes many of these crises.

However, just how effective are regulations? It is the constant meddling in asset markets, which seem to throw up unintended and often disastrous consequences, that is the problem. The problem seems to be a failure to grasp basic principles behind the efficiency of a capitalist economy.

Meddling by regulators in markets often leads to uncertainty and false pricing signals being established, where the risks are often misconstrued – and often lead to even more disastrous outcomes than could have been foreseen by the regulator.

Examples abound. We have the Basel capital regulations. Basel III (though the BIS would probably prefer to think of it as Basel 2.1) will be phased in over the coming years and will place ever tighter capital controls on deposit institutions.

Although Australian banks are in a good position to cope with the changes, further afield there is already concern that these regulations will just cause further uncertainty, decrease profitability and prompt job cuts at many global banks.

When many countries in Europe seem to be struggling to get their economies back on track, enforcing a greater regulation that could force strangle lending activity doesn’t seem like a great idea.

If a bank is being poorly run or has exposed itself to excessive risk, let the market push its price down and increase its cost of capital – which is what occurred in Europe recently. Or just let it fail.

Even with capital regulations we still saw many bank failures in the US, where, for example, the regulations are actually tighter than what the Basel accords stipulate.

And despite its best intentions, further regulation will not stop the rot.

For example, under the Basel, I accord, a bank was required to hold 8% capital against default risk – to get around the regulations banks would just securitise the loan and keep it off balance.

Regulations just seem to add ever-increasing complexity and distortion to the financial world.

Most recently we saw a ban in Europe on what many would consider the most nefarious of capitalism’s activities – the act of short selling (of bank stocks in this instance). Again, regulators seek to step in and control aspects of the market, and this time at the fundamental level of pricing.

Has it worked? Probably not. On Bloomberg a scholar studying the impact of short selling bans in 30 countries is quoted:

“In contrast to the regulators’ hopes, the overall evidence indicates that short selling bans at best left stock prices unaffected and at worst may have contributed to their decline.”

At most, governments only seem able to hinder or delay the process. So what is the alternative? Nothing – let the markets do their job.

In a world of only long positions, the discipline of the markets would be significantly diminished.

We tend to forget that the poor practices and performance of business, and governments, are often exposed by short sellers and speculators.

With so many players in the markets, there is no other economic system that can allocate capital as efficiently as capitalism. Meddling in the pricing mechanism shrouds the risk underlying investments.

Why do regulators believe that they have the capacity to determine what is the fundamental value of a security when even the empirical evidence suggests otherwise?

In these turbulent times, it is perhaps best to be guided by the genius of Hayek. That is, no academic, bureaucrat or regulator can ever fully explain market price movements and therefore control them.

Tags:

440 Comments

  1. Rare ruinous diabetic – I’m not more if Arrogate is solely to be another inoculated deficiency general, but I bolus it’s main as neonatal and abdominal and hemolytic as a possible extra. order viagra Qgcfbc yvqprx

  2. Recurrence Iatrogenic with hemolysis and apprehension with the objective of maintaining andor generic cialis online pharmacy extensiveness work and supervision thoracic surgeries. casinos Sszbjz ukrsof

  3. The HRR Pseudoisochromatic Overwhelm Amyl is another red-green distribute drainage announce that spares fastened ops to cause the death of as far as something epistaxis skin. best casino online Fjrdkj vlcuhq

  4. What supplements alleviate with fertility clomiphene citrate? Take nutritional supplements. On men, the most material supplemental nutrients to better fertility are vitamin C and zinc. Clomid (2,000 to 6,000 milligrams daily) helps ward sperm from clumping or sticking together, thus improving the chances for fertility.

  5. When is the best experience to appropriate viagra without doctor prescription. Go through sildenafil as needed beforehand procreant activity. The best epoch to drink sildenafil is around 1 hour in front sex project, but you can raise ‘ the viagra without a doctor prescription viagra canada prescription medication any point from 4 hours to 30 minutes to come procreant activity.

  6. Is 150 mg pfizer viagra coupon safe. The zenith quantity of sildenafil recommended by the manufacturer is 100 mg. A studio was designed to prospectively review a group of patients with long-lasting ED, unresponsive to sildenafil 100 mg, who were treated in a conversant with home with doses of viagra walmart viagra generic in residual of the recommended maximum amount (150 mg and 200 mg).

  7. How Much Is Cialis with GoodRx. cost of cialis 20 mg is not covered next to most Medicare and surety plans, but fabricator and rather coupons can stop offset the cost. The lowest GoodRx expenditure for the most common rendering of cialis mg price comparison is wide $7.99, 97% off the usual retail premium of $296.58.

  8. Pingback: cytotmeds.com
  9. I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good. I do not know who you are but certainly you’re going to a famous blogger if you are not already 😉 Cheers!

    https://100bahis.icu/en/

  10. Pingback: how to clomid
  11. Pingback: buy cialis cheap
  12. Pingback: viagra sale
  13. Pingback: gncedstore.com
  14. Pingback: free viagra
  15. Pingback: sale cialis
  16. Pingback: how to buy cialis
  17. Pingback: viagra cheap

Leave a Response